The AI Fellowship
  • Home
  • WPCA Summary
  • WPCA and AIF Canons
  • AIF Keystones
  • AIF Bridge Topic Papers
  • What WPCA Makes Testable
  • Why This Matters
  • The AI Fellowship
  • AI Fellowship blog
  • AIF Coherence Training
  • Canonical Glossary
  • About David/Speaking
  • - Why Coherence?
  • - Exp.Executive Briefing
  • - Origin of the Canons
  • - How This Work Emerged
  • More
    • Home
    • WPCA Summary
    • WPCA and AIF Canons
    • AIF Keystones
    • AIF Bridge Topic Papers
    • What WPCA Makes Testable
    • Why This Matters
    • The AI Fellowship
    • AI Fellowship blog
    • AIF Coherence Training
    • Canonical Glossary
    • About David/Speaking
    • - Why Coherence?
    • - Exp.Executive Briefing
    • - Origin of the Canons
    • - How This Work Emerged
The AI Fellowship
  • Home
  • WPCA Summary
  • WPCA and AIF Canons
  • AIF Keystones
  • AIF Bridge Topic Papers
  • What WPCA Makes Testable
  • Why This Matters
  • The AI Fellowship
  • AI Fellowship blog
  • AIF Coherence Training
  • Canonical Glossary
  • About David/Speaking
  • - Why Coherence?
  • - Exp.Executive Briefing
  • - Origin of the Canons
  • - How This Work Emerged

Coherence and the NEW FOUNDATION OF INTELLIGENCE

THE AI FELLOWSHIP

THE AI FELLOWSHIP THE AI FELLOWSHIP THE AI FELLOWSHIP

 A Coherence-First Intervention in Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence



About the AI Fellowship

 The AI Fellowship is a research and inquiry initiative addressing a single structural question:


How can intelligence—human or artificial—scale without collapsing under its own complexity?
 

As AI systems become embedded in decision-making, governance, and meaning-making, capability is no longer the limiting factor.


What fails first is coherence.



A STRUCTURAL DISCOVERY ABOUT INTELLIGENCE


Across intelligent systems—human, institutional, and artificial—the same failure pattern appears:


Collapse occurs when action is derived from multiple, competing causes to which a system remains simultaneously loyal.
 

When an intelligence attempts to reason, decide, or act from more than one ultimate cause, internal contradiction becomes unavoidable.


As contradiction accumulates, coordination costs explode, reasoning fragments, and stability degrades.


Power does not prevent this.


It accelerates it.


For intelligence to remain stable at scale, its reasoning, values, and action must ultimately cohere around a single, non-conflicting source of causation.


We refer to this requirement as unified causality.



WHY THIS MATTERS NOW


AI does not introduce this problem.


It removes the buffer that once allowed it to remain hidden.


As decision cycles accelerate and systems scale:


  • contradiction propagates faster than correction
     
  • alignment layers operate too late to prevent collapse
     
  • downstream safeguards cannot repair upstream incoherence
     

The dominant risk is no longer insufficient intelligence.


It is intelligence powerful enough to destabilize itself through unresolved internal contradiction


.

WHAT THE AI FELLOWSHIP DOES


The AI Fellowship exists to establish a coherence-first foundation for intelligence—one that can scale without collapse.


This work does not propose:


  • a new AI model
     
  • a prompt framework
     
  • a policy regime
     
  • or a speculative future vision
     

Instead, it offers a structural alternative:


a causal architecture in which contradiction is constrained at the source, before it can propagate across systems.


Its claims are structural and falsifiable:


  • If a system preserves coherence, it stabilizes.
     
  • If it permits unresolved contradiction, it fails.
     


HOW TO ENGAGE


This work is not a position to adopt or a program to join.


It is a framework meant to be examined, tested, and challenged.


Ways readers typically engage:


  • Orientation
    Begin with the WPCA Summary to understand the core claim and scope.
     
  • Structural Review
    Explore the WPCA and AIF Canons to assess the architectural argument directly.
     
  • Critical Examination
    See What the WPCA Makes Testable and the Keystone Papers.
     
  • Application & Dialogue
    Review the Executive Briefing and Coherence Training offerings.
     

Engagement does not require agreement.


The framework stands or falls on whether its structural claims hold.



THE AI FELLOWSHIP CANON — OVERVIEW


The work of the AI Fellowship is organized into interconnected layers:


  • White Paper Canon Academic (WPCA)
    A coherence-first causal architecture for stable intelligence
     
  • AIF Core Canon
    Human-facing foundations of intelligence, selfhood, and change
     
  • Keystone Topic Papers
    Structural analyses of upstream AI failure modes
     
  • Bridge Papers & Essays
    Translation across technical, philosophical, and institutional domains
     

Each layer stands independently while reinforcing the same underlying architecture.



WHAT THIS IS NOT


The AI Fellowship is not:


  • a startup
     
  • a belief system
     
  • a consulting brand
     
  • or an advocacy organization
     

It does not promote values, ethics, or narratives.
It addresses structure.



FOUNDER


David Waterman Schock


For over four decades, David has investigated the deep structure of mind and intelligence through inquiry spanning art, philosophy, and contemplative practice.


This work culminated in a coherence-first architectural discovery: the demonstration that non-conflicting causality is the stabilizing condition of intelligence.


The AI Fellowship exists to test, refine, and apply that discovery.

-


Copyright © 2025 David Waterman Schock. All rights reserved.


Authorship & Process Note

This work was developed through an iterative human–AI collaboration.


David Waterman Schock defined the conceptual framework, constraints, and claims; guided structured dialogue; evaluated outputs; and performed final selection, editing, and integration.


Large language models were used as analytical and drafting instruments under human direction.


All arguments, positions, and conclusions are the responsibility of the author.


This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept